Traveling the World

When Americans think of Europe, they think of the major/capital cities like London, Paris, Rome, Athens. Most families go for about two or three weeks because they want to hit all the major sight-seeing spots like the Eiffel Tower, the islands of Santorini, or a boat ride in Venice, but enjoy the beauty and history of the land that are likely to only see once in their lifetime because these trips can be costly. Historical significance seems to be another theme in the European travel guide because Americans like to see architectural marvels from before the time of Christ and other attractions that were considered ruins long before our Founding Fathers had been born. America is ethnically and culturally diverse, perhaps like no other nation in the world and Americans want to see something that is distinctly Irish or German or Polish so they can see what their traditions have evolved from; the original model, if you will. Americans want to see places where they have only read about or heard stories of. they want authentic Italian food from Italy, they want beer from Germany and maybe even some croissants in France in the shadow of the Eiffel Tower. Americans, like Europeans, want to see major attractions, world wonders, places to go and objects to see before you die, but even though they have read about and possibly seen it on television, actually experiencing it in person is much more powerful and an everlasting memory, which is ultimately what Americans desire when they travel Europe.

Europeans traveling to America are bombarded with many different options across the country, but it depends what part they intend to visit, but if they want to go coast to coast, one travel site has the Grand Canyon, Universal Studios, and  Red Rock Canyon in Colorado as their top three overall destinations in the U.S. Others on the list include Miami Beach, Ground Zero in NYC and Sea World. It seems as if the travel agencies are catering to the likes of the Europeans or other foreigners in showing a healthy mix of natural grandeur and man-made marvels. the Golden Gate Bridge, Hollywood and Central Park in NYC as well as the Statue of Liberty seem to be other highly attractive places in which Europeans don't often see in their own lands because of the famous architects or brilliant minds who helped develop the relatively new country in America. Europeans seem to like the natural beauty that has been there for millions of years, along with the mix of new technology and design  in America, seeing as how it is a couple of thousand years the junior of most of the established sight seeing spots of Europe. Some Europeans may even come to see the art that is seeing 8 million people try and traverse 469 square miles of NYC, while getting to their destination on time. Others may just come to see all those people and then drive 30 minutes out of the City and see farmland as far as the eye can see. Beaches, architectural marvels and even museums are commonplace amongst the travel guides for the United States, which leads one to believe those traits are what make America is distinctly American because the variety and input from a vast array of cultures and nationalities, not found in Europe because those are the origins of America; the United States just brings all those idea into one place, making the diversity and variety in a comparably small area unique to America. America has some of the most publicized history, of which is also targeted and such powerful building in Washington, D.C. are also sights to been seen, not only for their beauty, but because the most powerful people in the world work there everyday.

Europeans have the notion that America is still young and new, but that is part of the attraction as well as the diversity of culture and nationality that makes America the melting pot it is, which is what many European come here for, in my opinion. I think the themes of diversity and grandeur have been clearly laid out as the two main reasons Europeans come to experience America, which would be, in my view, correct values to place on the United States.

NYC/London

London has a distinct, royal look to it, mainly because a great succession of royal families have built it over the last several centuries to what we see today. the buildings are very ornate and represent the 16th, 17th, and 18th century tastes of style and architecture of the periods in which they were built. The designs on the stone buildings is very ornate and the stone buildings are commonly found throughout the city. The Royal taste was only for the best materials to be used on such buildings as the British Parliament buildings (which is the orange-looking one on the left) and other Royal/government buildings. Not many of the structures look to rise above 10 stories. It also appears that London appears to maintain as much greenspace as possible, especially along the body of water that runs through the 

city.

The next two pictures are of New York City, in which skyscrapers are numerous and hide many of the smaller buildings next to them. Unlike London, New York had a few different ethnic groups in the 19th century and varying degrees of wealth, which both factored into the design and size of the buildings. London also had some more room to work with in terms of area, whereas New York's frame of mind was to keep going up to achieve the desired space they needed. The skyscrapers are also mixed in with older buildings, which is an American thing because new buildings seemed to represent the opportunity to show wealth, but most importantly, progress. Old buildings were seen as a peace of the past, not necessarily planned to continue into the future, but the skyscrapers made them less noticeable and made them less relied upon. Also, I have observed, that the more important/powerful a company is, the taller the building that is built and the more windows it has.

It seems that London maintains is Royal appearance because the people that live there, mostly are English, and the people who make the decisions about the landscape of the city enjoy their English roots. New York was at one time the largest immigrant center int he world and the type of architecture that is shown in NY is because of the different ideas coming from varying parts of the world.

Buffalo's West Side

I chose the West Side of Buffalo, particularly because my father's side of the family all lived on the West Side at one point during the early to mid 20th century. The West Side has always been well known for its strong Italian heritage and population. While Italians still remain on the West Side, running a handful of restaurants, the Hispanic population has mostly made it their own enclave.

Even though the West Side is predominantly Puerto Rican, many African American, Middle Eastern, Central American, Somali, and Burmese immigrants currently live there. Unlike many other parts of Buffalo, the West Side still has many factors going in its favor like Buffalo State College and Kleinhans Music Hall. However, the neighborhood itself, is older than it looks because the money isn't there to fund for repairs. Street after street was lined with houses that were in disrepair and buildings and lots that were vacant. even though the Puerto Ricans have made the West Side mostly their own, the Italian infastructure is still there seeing as how each house and building was built in the early 20th century, which marked the Italians biggest influx of citizens.

The houses are moderate, wood built homes, that are mostly three- stories and could house one or two families. Also, I noticed that the houses were spaced close together, which I never fully understood, but my best guess was a strong sense of community and not a whole lot of space to work with.

Buffalo was a major industrial city, with the West Side playing a pivotal role in the shipping and import of goods into the city, which is what many of the Italians did to make a living. Italians also brought their own culture with them in the way of food, of which there are still quite a few Italian restaurants left in the area, specifically Left Bank, which is located on Rhode Island St. and Mineo and Sapio Italian Sausage. However, when the city suffered suburbanization in the post- WWII era and deinsudtrialization the Italians moved to the suburbs and left what they had built behind. Still prime for immigrants some 60 years after the first wave, Puerto Ricans have made it their home in Buffalo.

Many corner stores have their products painted on the sides of the stores, which was commonplace among the two or three corner stores that I saw on my journey. The Hispanic transformation is evident as there is now a Puerto Rican Day Parade that takes places on Niagara St., which is also known as Avenida San Juan, just like the actual one in Puerto Rico.The Niagara Cafe serves Chicken with rice and beans, which is a staple of Puerto Rican food and is a quite popular restaurant among its residents.




Even though the West Side still has a lot of work to so to make the neighborhood a place where children can roam free and large sections are not an eyesore,  parts of the West Side are being kept up and are being preserved and restored. There is hope for the West Side of Buffalo, that is does not remain in urban blight and does not carry the characteristics of the post-WWII "Noir City".